
DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH)
Propnex Realty Pte. Ltd.
CEA R072693G · License L3008022J
Data last verified 11 Aug 2026 against CEA's public register
Total Deals
1
Last 12 Months
0
Active Years
1
Where DAPHNE ranks
Ranked against 29,879 agents with total deals on record. Bars show the share of agents in each band.
Activity Over Time
Get in touch with Daphne
Tell us what you're after and we will link you up with Daphne directly.
Deal Breakdown
Property Type
Representing
Top Districts
Top Towns
No data
How does DAPHNE compare?
See the most active agents in the categories DAPHNEworks in — each ranked by deal activity from CEA's public records.
No active listings found for this agent.
Get in touch with Daphne
Tell us what you're after and we will link you up with Daphne directly.
Considering DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH)? See where they're strongest.
How DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH)'s record stacks up against other agents in the same area.
DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH) is above the area average on closed deals — strong and active in the area.
Common Questions About DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH)
Is DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH) a registered property agent in Singapore?
Yes. DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH) is registered with the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA), Singapore's regulator for property agents. Their CEA registration number is R072693G and their current agency license number is L3008022J.
How many deals has DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH) closed?
DAPHNE JABEZ GOH (DAPHNE GOH) has closed 1 property transactions on record from 2025 to 2025 — including 0 sales and 1 rentals. In the last 12 months alone, they closed 0 deals.
What kind of properties does DAPHNE specialise in?
DAPHNE primarily handles Condo properties — 1 out of 1 deals (100%). The full breakdown: Condo (1).
Which areas of Singapore does DAPHNE cover?
DAPHNE has most deals in. Top districts by deal count: District 15 (1 deals).
Is DAPHNE still actively closing deals?
DAPHNE has not closed any deals in the past 12 months on record. Their last recorded transaction was in 2025. They may have shifted focus or retired.
