
DBSS and HUDC Flats Explained: What They Were, What DBSS Flats Sell For, and Where the HUDC Estates Went
Two public housing schemes that no longer take new buyers: HDB flats designed and sold by private developers, and the 18 HUDC estates that were privatised. What each was, what DBSS flats resell for against nearby flats, and what became of all 18 HUDC estates.
DBSS (Design, Build and Sell Scheme) flats are HDB flats that private developers designed, built and sold from 2005; land sales for new DBSS projects stopped in 2012, and MND has no plans to revive the scheme. There are 13 DBSS projects in HDB's resale records; their flats now resell as ordinary HDB flats, with a median premium of +16% per square metre over same-town flats of similar age. HUDC flats were in 18 estates sold from the 1970s by the Housing & Urban Development Company and later HDB; all 18 were privatised between 1996 and 2017, so none is an HDB flat today: 13 have since been sold en bloc, and the five still standing trade as private homes.

DBSS and HUDC are two HDB schemes you can no longer buy into new, but whose flats still shape the market. DBSS flats were HDB flats designed, built and sold by private developers from 2005; HUDC estates were 18 estates first sold by the Housing & Urban Development Company and later by HDB, all of them privatised by 2017.
This guide explains what each scheme was, what MND has said about why DBSS stopped, what DBSS flats resell for against comparable flats on PropKaki's analysis of HDB's records, what happened to every HUDC estate, and the rules if you buy one of these homes today. Sources are HDB's and MND's, as at 25 September 2026.
What is a DBSS flat?
A DBSS flat is an HDB flat built under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme, which MND says was introduced in 2005 "to give flat buyers more choice by allowing private developers to design and build some public flats". Developers also sold them. Land sales for new DBSS projects stopped in 2012.
Under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS), a private developer bought a site, designed and built the flats and sold them directly to eligible buyers, instead of HDB doing all three as it does for Build-To-Order (BTO) flats. MND's summary (8 May 2023): the DBSS "was introduced in 2005 to give flat buyers more choice by allowing private developers to design and build some public flats. Land sales for the DBSS have been suspended since 2012."
| Key fact | DBSS flats (verify on HDB) |
|---|---|
| Built by | Private developers, on land sold under the scheme |
| Introduced | 2005 |
| Ended | Land sales suspended since 2012; MND said in 2018 it has "no plans to reactivate the scheme" |
| Projects in HDB's resale records | 13, with leases starting 2008 to 2015 |
| Resales so far | 4,084, of which 587 at $1 million or more |
| Status today | Resold on the open market as HDB flats, under HDB's resale rules |
| Counts as a housing subsidy | A DBSS flat bought from the developer counts as a subsidised flat in HDB's rules |
A DBSS flat is an HDB flat with a private developer's design: you buy and sell it under HDB's rules.
What is the difference between a DBSS flat and a normal HDB flat?
Who designed, built and first sold it. A BTO flat is designed, built and sold by HDB; a DBSS flat was designed, built and sold by a private developer. Once resold, both are HDB flats under the same resale, occupation and eligibility rules.
| DBSS flat | BTO flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Designed and built by | A private developer | HDB |
| First sold by | The developer | HDB, which MND says is "fully responsible for the timely delivery and quality of the flats sold" |
| Buying one today | Resale only, as an HDB resale flat | New from HDB, or resale |
| Resale rules | HDB's | HDB's |
| Counts as a subsidised flat | Yes, if bought from the developer; HDB's resale-levy list names one bought from the developer with a CPF housing grant | Yes |
MND written answers of 8 May 2023 and 13 July 2015; HDB's conditions after buying a resale flat, as of 2026.
On the ground, DBSS projects were marketed on design: their names (Trivelis, Natura Loft, Centrale 8 and the rest) are a giveaway on the resale market. Our guide to buying a resale HDB flat applies to them in full.
Which DBSS projects are there?
HDB's resale records show 13 DBSS projects, completed with leases starting from 2008 (The Premiere @ Tampines) to 2015 (Pasir Ris One), in Tampines, Ang Mo Kio, Bishan, Kallang/Whampoa, Toa Payoh, Yishun, Bedok, Clementi, Hougang, Jurong West and Pasir Ris.
The DBSS projects in HDB's resale records, with how often their flats have changed hands:
| Project | Town | Lease start | Resales | Resales at $1m or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Premiere @ Tampines | Tampines | 2008 | 370 | 10 |
| Park Central @ AMK | Ang Mo Kio | 2011 | 327 | 61 |
| Natura Loft | Bishan | 2011 | 252 | 119 |
| City View @ Boon Keng | Kallang/Whampoa | 2011 | 377 | 124 |
| Parc Lumiere | Tampines | 2011 | 223 | 1 |
| The Peak @ Toa Payoh | Toa Payoh | 2012 | 583 | 203 |
| Adora Green | Yishun | 2013 | 347 | 0 |
| Belvia | Bedok | 2014 | 241 | 10 |
| Trivelis | Clementi | 2014 | 371 | 44 |
| Parkland Residences | Hougang | 2014 | 274 | 4 |
| Lake Vista @ Yuan Ching | Jurong West | 2014 | 227 | 0 |
| Centrale 8 at Tampines | Tampines | 2014 | 315 | 10 |
| Pasir Ris One | Pasir Ris | 2015 | 177 | 1 |
PropKaki analysis of HDB resale records; project names from HDB's block record.
The $1 million sales cluster in four projects: The Peak @ Toa Payoh, City View @ Boon Keng, Natura Loft in Bishan and Park Central @ AMK. PropKaki does not rank projects: the right one depends on the town, the flat and your budget.
What do DBSS flats resell for compared with other HDB flats?
More per square metre. From September 2024 to August 2026, across 18 DBSS project and flat-type groups, the median premium was +16% per square metre over non-DBSS flats of the same town, flat type and similar age, ranging from +5% to +31%. DBSS flats are often smaller, so the gap in the total price is narrower.
Comparing a DBSS flat with any HDB flat in its town is unfair: DBSS flats are newer than most. PropKaki compared each DBSS project's resales with non-DBSS resales of the same town and flat type, from blocks whose lease started within two years of the DBSS project's, sold over the same months:
| DBSS project and flat type | DBSS per sqm | DBSS sqm | Comparable per sqm | Comparable sqm | DBSS premium per sqm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Central @ AMK, 4 Room | $10,978 | 90 | $9,807 | 94 | +12% |
| City View @ Boon Keng, 4 Room | $11,489 | 95 | $10,169 | 92 | +13% |
| Adora Green, 4 Room | $8,293 | 92 | $6,359 | 92 | +30% |
| Adora Green, 5 Room | $8,214 | 112 | $6,272 | 112 | +31% |
| Belvia, 3 Room | $9,816 | 66 | $8,765 | 68 | +12% |
| Belvia, 4 Room | $9,885 | 87 | $8,710 | 93 | +13% |
| Trivelis, 3 Room | $11,367 | 60 | $9,590 | 73 | +19% |
| Trivelis, 4 Room | $11,962 | 81 | $9,697 | 99 | +23% |
| Parkland Residences, 3 Room | $8,849 | 67 | $7,665 | 67 | +15% |
| Parkland Residences, 4 Room | $8,587 | 92 | $7,449 | 92 | +15% |
| Parkland Residences, 5 Room | $8,716 | 112 | $7,759 | 112 | +12% |
| Lake Vista @ Yuan Ching, 3 Room | $8,284 | 67 | $7,148 | 68 | +16% |
| Lake Vista @ Yuan Ching, 4 Room | $7,835 | 91 | $6,727 | 92 | +16% |
| Lake Vista @ Yuan Ching, 5 Room | $8,472 | 108 | $6,716 | 113 | +26% |
| Centrale 8 at Tampines, 3 Room | $10,645 | 62 | $8,529 | 67 | +25% |
| Centrale 8 at Tampines, 4 Room | $10,298 | 84 | $8,473 | 93 | +22% |
| Centrale 8 at Tampines, 5 Room | $9,074 | 108 | $8,659 | 113 | +5% |
| Pasir Ris One, 4 Room | $9,628 | 86 | $8,161 | 93 | +18% |
PropKaki analysis of HDB resale records, September 2024 to August 2026; groups with fewer than 10 sales either side left out.
Three things stand out:
- Every group sold at a premium per square metre, from +5% to +31%; the median was +16%.
- DBSS flats are often smaller. A Trivelis 4-room flat's median size is 81 sqm against 99 sqm for comparable Clementi 4-room flats, so its total price is close to theirs despite the higher rate.
- Size explains part of it. Smaller flats fetch more per square metre, so part of the premium, especially at Trivelis, reflects size rather than the DBSS label; floor level can play a part too.
- Some projects have no fair comparison. For 9 project and flat-type groups, such as The Peak @ Toa Payoh and Natura Loft, fewer than 10 non-DBSS flats of similar age and type sold in the same town, so we left them out rather than compare them with older flats.
Price a DBSS flat per square metre against flats of the same type and age in the same town, not per flat against the whole town.
How many DBSS flats have sold for $1 million or more?
587 DBSS resales reached $1 million or more by September 2026 on HDB's records, up from 229 up to March 2023, which matches MND's cumulative count up to the first quarter of 2023.
MND told Parliament on 8 May 2023 that "To-date (up to 1Q 2023), 229 DBSS flats have been sold in the open market for $1 million or more." PropKaki's count of HDB's resale records gives exactly 229 up to March 2023, which is how we know the two sources line up, and 587 by September 2026.
Most of those sales are in four projects in Toa Payoh, Kallang/Whampoa, Bishan and Ang Mo Kio (see the project table above): The Peak @ Toa Payoh, City View @ Boon Keng, Natura Loft and Park Central @ AMK. Suburban DBSS projects such as Adora Green in Yishun and Lake Vista @ Yuan Ching have had none.
Why was the DBSS scheme discontinued?
MND has said only that land sales for DBSS were suspended in 2012 and that it has "no plans to reactivate the scheme", adding in 2018 that BTO flats, ECs and resale flats meet buyers' needs. It has not published a single official reason.
MND's answer to Parliament on 6 February 2018: "The land sales for the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS) has been suspended since 2012, and MND has no plans to reactivate the scheme." It added that the goal of "a variety of affordable housing options" can be met "with new BTO flats and Executive Condominiums, as well as the many housing options available in the resale market".
In July 2015, three years after DBSS land sales were suspended, MPs asked in Parliament about complaints over the quality of some DBSS projects, and MND contrasted the BTO programme, where HDB is "fully responsible for the timely delivery and quality of the flats sold". MND did not give that as the reason for the suspension, and PropKaki does not attribute it to any one cause.
What is a HUDC flat?
HUDC flats were homes in 18 estates sold first by the Housing & Urban Development Company, set up in 1974, and later by HDB. All 18 were privatised between 1996 and 2017, the last being Braddell View, so there are no HUDC flats left under HDB: five estates still stand as private homes, and the other 13 have been sold en bloc.
HDB's own history of the scheme (annex to its release of 17 March 2017):
- 1974: the Housing & Urban Development Co. (Private) Limited was incorporated, and went on to sell six estates (Farrer Court, Amberville, Lakeview, Laguna Park, Chancery Court and Braddell View).
- 1982: HDB took over the management of those estates; 1984: HDB sold 12 more HUDC projects.
- 24 May 1995: the Government announced the HUDC privatisation programme.
- 1996 to 2017: all 18 estates were privatised, the first Pine Grove and Gillman Heights on 1 November 1996, the last Braddell View (918 flats) on 17 March 2017, "marking the closure of the HUDC privatisation programme".
A privatised HUDC flat now counts as private residential property in HDB's rules, and having had one through privatisation counts as having taken a housing subsidy.
What happened to each HUDC estate?
Of the 18, five still trade as private homes. The other 13 were sold en bloc: HDB lists five as redeveloped after collective sales (Farrer Court, Amberville, Gillman Heights, Hougang South and Bedok Reservoir), and URA's records show the other eight sold between May 2016 and May 2018.
All 18 HUDC estates, with their privatisation dates from HDB and their status on PropKaki's copy of URA's private transaction records:
| HUDC estate (later name) | Privatised | Flats | Today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pine Grove | 1 Nov 1996 | 660 | Trading as private homes |
| Gillman Heights | 1 Nov 1996 | 607 | Redeveloped as The Interlace |
| Jurong East (Ivory Heights) | 1 Jun 1998 | 654 | Trading as private homes |
| Hougang South (Minton Rise) | 1 Feb 2001 | 342 | Redeveloped as The Minton |
| Bedok Reservoir | 1 Feb 2002 | 583 | Redeveloped as the Waterfront condominiums |
| Tampines Court | 1 Apr 2002 | 560 | Sold en bloc, 22 Aug 2017 ($970m) |
| Farrer Court | 15 Nov 2002 | 618 | Redeveloped as d'Leedon |
| Amberville | 16 Dec 2002 | 168 | Redeveloped as Silversea |
| Lakeview | 1 Aug 2003 | 240 | Trading as private homes |
| Chancery Court | 24 May 2004 | 136 | Sold en bloc, 16 May 2018 ($401.8m) |
| Laguna Park | 16 Jul 2007 | 516 | Trading as private homes |
| Eunosville | 1 Jun 2011 | 330 | Sold en bloc, 31 May 2017 ($765.8m) |
| Shunfu (Shunfu Ville) | 28 Mar 2013 | 358 | Sold en bloc, 19 May 2016 ($638m) |
| Serangoon North (Serangoon Ville) | 8 May 2014 | 244 | Sold en bloc, 26 Jul 2017 ($499m) |
| Hougang Ave 2 (Florence Regency) | 22 May 2014 | 336 | Sold en bloc, 20 Oct 2017 ($629m) |
| Hougang Ave 7 (Rio Casa) | 13 Jun 2014 | 286 | Sold en bloc, 24 May 2017 ($575m) |
| Potong Pasir Ave 1 (Raintree Gardens) | 1 Jul 2014 | 175 | Sold en bloc, 6 Oct 2016 ($334.2m) |
| Braddell View | 17 Mar 2017 | 918 | Trading as private homes |
Privatisation dates, flat counts and redevelopments: HDB, 17 March 2017. "Trading" and "Sold en bloc": PropKaki analysis of URA transaction records by project name; an en bloc sale is the estate's last record, at an ENBLOC address, and its unit count can differ slightly from HDB's flat count.
The five still trading, and what they sold for from September 2024 to August 2026:
| Estate | Private sales | Median price per sq ft | Tenure (URA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braddell View | 63 | $1,041 | 102 yrs from 01/02/1978 (and 2 other lease records) |
| Ivory Heights | 13 | $1,058 | 100 yrs from 01/02/1986 |
| Laguna Park | 36 | $1,177 | 99 yrs from 24/08/1977 |
| Lakeview Estate | 15 | $1,053 | 99 yrs from 01/06/1977 |
| Pine Grove | 49 | $1,041 | 99 yrs from 01/11/1984 |
PropKaki analysis of URA private transaction records.
Is Lagoon View a HUDC estate?
No. Lagoon View is not one of the 18 HUDC estates in HDB's list. URA's records show it as a private apartment project on a 99-year lease from 1977.
HDB's history of the HUDC programme names all 18 estates, and Lagoon View is not among them. In URA's private transaction records, Lagoon View appears as "Apartment" with a tenure of "99 yrs from 15/11/1977". Estates from the same era that were HUDC include Laguna Park and Lakeview, both on HDB's list and both still trading as private homes.
Can you still buy a DBSS or HUDC flat, and what rules apply?
A DBSS flat, yes, on the HDB resale market under HDB's usual resale rules. A former HUDC flat, only as a private property: it is no longer an HDB flat, so HDB's grants and loans do not apply to it, and owning one bars you from buying from HDB, buying a resale flat with grants or a resale Plus or Prime flat, or taking an HDB loan, until 30 months after you have sold it.
- DBSS flats are HDB resale flats. You need an HDB Flat Eligibility letter, the resale grants and HDB loan follow the normal rules, and the minimum occupation period applies once you buy. Buying a DBSS flat on the resale market with a CPF housing grant counts as taking a housing subsidy.
- Former HUDC flats are private condominiums. HDB counts a "privatised HUDC flat" as private residential property, so owning one has the same effect on HDB eligibility as any private home. To buy a flat from HDB, a resale Plus or Prime flat or a resale flat with CPF housing grants, or to take an HDB loan, no one listed may own one, or have sold one in the 30 months before the HFE letter application. To buy a resale unclassified or Standard flat without those grants (the Proximity Housing Grant is allowed), you may still own one, but must sell it within 6 months of completing your flat purchase.
Our resale step-by-step guide covers the DBSS purchase, and our guide to CPF housing grants for resale flats the grants.
What is the biggest mistake people make with DBSS and HUDC flats?
Treating the labels as a price guide. A DBSS flat's premium per square metre over comparable flats ranges widely, and some DBSS flats are markedly smaller; a former HUDC flat is a private home with private-market rules.
Both labels describe how a home began, not what it is worth. For DBSS flats, the premium per square metre over comparable flats ran from +5% to +31% in the past two years, and several projects' flats are much smaller than their neighbours'. For former HUDC estates, the HDB connection is history: they are private property, priced and financed as such.
Compare a DBSS flat per square metre with flats of the same type and age in the same town; compare an ex-HUDC flat with private homes.
Official sources
Check HDB and MND directly.
Methodology and sources
Where every figure comes from, and what we deliberately did not claim.
Official rules and figures. What DBSS was, when it started and stopped, and the $1 million count to 2023 are from MND's written answers of 8 May 2023 and 6 February 2018 and its oral answer of 13 July 2015; the HUDC history, estate list, flat counts and redevelopments from the annex to HDB's release of 17 March 2017 (read from an archived copy, because HDB's old address now redirects); how DBSS and privatised HUDC flats count in HDB's rules from HDB's grant and conditions pages. All read on 25 September 2026.
Proprietary figures. The DBSS project list, resale counts, $1 million counts and the price-per-sqm comparison are PropKaki's analysis of HDB resale records and block record; our count of $1 million sales up to March 2023 matches MND's 229 exactly. The ex-HUDC trading figures, the eight en bloc sales and the Lagoon View record are PropKaki's analysis of URA private transaction records. How we work: PropKaki methodology.
What we have not claimed: that any DBSS project is a better buy than another; why DBSS was suspended, which MND's answers do not state; or what has been built on the sites URA's records show sold en bloc. This is a practical explainer, not legal or financial advice.
Got a question this raised? Ask PropKaki.
Take any point from this analysis and apply it to your own project, budget or decision.
For most buyers this year, staying well within budget beats trying to time the market.
