
How Much Singapore Property Do Foreigners Own — and Still Buy? (2026)
Permanent residents and foreigners own about a sixth of Singapore's private homes — but foreign buying has collapsed under the cooling measures. The data, and what it means.
Permanent residents and foreigners together own 16.1% of Singapore's private homes — 74,672 of 464,368 units — while Singaporeans own 79.5% and companies 4.4%. But foreign buying has collapsed: foreigners purchased just 2.1% of new private units in 2026Q1 (42 units), a fraction of pre-2023 levels, after Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty for foreigners was raised to 60%. Ownership is concentrated in non-landed homes (18.8%); landed property is effectively closed to foreigners (1.7%). So foreigners own a meaningful stock but are now marginal buyers.

Few property questions generate more heat than foreign ownership — and few are answered so clearly by the data. This page separates two things that usually get muddled: how much Singapore private property foreigners already own, and how much they are still buying now.
The two numbers tell very different stories, and the gap between them is the clearest measure of what the cooling measures did. It is part of our overview of the Singapore property market.
How much Singapore private property do foreigners own?
Permanent residents and foreigners together own 16.1% of Singapore's private homes (74,672 of 464,368 units); Singaporeans own 79.5% and companies 4.4%. And that is private property only — HDB flats, where most people live, are overwhelmingly citizen-owned.
Less than the debate usually assumes. Permanent residents and foreigners together own 16.1% of Singapore's private homes — 74,672 of 464,368 units — while Singaporeans own 79.5% and companies the rest:
| Owner | Units | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Singaporeans | 369,262 | 79.5% |
| PRs + foreigners | 74,672 | 16.1% |
| Companies | 20,434 | 4.4% |
Two things to keep straight. First, this counts private homes only — condos, apartments and landed; the HDB flats where most Singaporeans live are overwhelmingly citizen-owned and not in this figure, so the foreign share of all housing is far smaller still. Second, URA reports PRs and foreigners together in the ownership stock, so the pure-foreigner slice is smaller than 16.1% — a large part of it is permanent residents who live here. Singaporeans, in other words, own the clear majority of even the private market.
Are foreigners still buying Singapore property?
Barely. In 2026Q1, foreigners bought just 2.1% of new private homes (42 units), versus 86.7% by Singaporeans and 11.2% by PRs. Foreigners own a stock built up over decades but are now a rounding error in new purchases.
Barely. Whatever foreigners own, they have almost stopped adding to it. In 2026Q1, of every new private home bought, foreigners took just 2.1% — 42 units — while Singaporeans bought 86.7% and PRs 11.2%:
| Buyer | New units bought | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Singaporeans | 1,723 | 86.7% |
| Singapore PRs | 222 | 11.2% |
| Foreigners | 42 | 2.1% |
| Companies | 0 | 0.0% |
This is the crucial distinction: ownership is a stock built up over decades; buying is the flow happening now. The 16.1% owned reflects years of past purchases, many made before the cooling measures bit. The 2.1% bought reflects today's rules — and today, foreigners are a rounding error in the new-sale market. (These are uncompleted, new-sale units; the count is small and swings quarter to quarter, but the direction has been unmistakable.)
Why do foreigners own 16% but buy only 2%?
Stamp duty. Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty for foreigners was raised to 60% in 2023, near-totally deterring new foreign purchases. The 16.1% owned was built up over decades; the 2.1% bought is what a 60% duty produces now.
One word: stamp duty. In April 2023, Singapore doubled the Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty (ABSD) on foreign buyers to 60% — meaning a foreigner buying a $2 million home now pays $1.2 million in duty on top of the price. That is a deliberate wall, and it works: foreign buying fell to the low single digits, where it remains.
So the two numbers are simply two different eras:
- The 16.1% owned was accumulated over decades, much of it before the heaviest cooling measures.
- The 2.1% bought is what happens under a 60% duty — near-total deterrence of new foreign purchases.
Permanent residents, who face a lower ABSD than foreigners, still buy modestly (11.2%). The stock will only shift slowly, because owning is sticky and selling is a choice — but at the current buying rate, the foreign share of the market is drifting down, not up. ABSD rates are as of 2026 — verify the current figure on IRAS; see also our ABSD rates guide.
Can foreigners buy landed property in Singapore?
Almost never. Foreigners generally cannot buy landed homes without government approval (the main exception is Sentosa Cove), which is why PRs and foreigners own just 1.7% of landed property versus 18.8% of non-landed.
Almost never — and the ownership data shows it. PRs and foreigners own just 1.7% of Singapore's landed homes, versus 18.8% of non-landed (condos and apartments):
| Property type | PR + foreigner share |
|---|---|
| Non-landed (condos, apartments) | 18.8% |
| Landed (houses) | 1.7% |
That gap is by design. Under the Residential Property Act, foreigners generally cannot buy landed homes without government approval, which is granted sparingly and typically requires significant economic contribution. The one broad exception is Sentosa Cove, where foreigners may buy landed homes under a lighter approval process.
So foreign participation is concentrated almost entirely in the non-landed market — condos and apartments — where nearly one in five units is PR- or foreigner-owned. Landed housing remains, in practice, a Singaporean market. Rules are as of 2026 — verify with the Singapore Land Authority (SLA).
What does low foreign buying mean for the property market?
The market is now driven almost entirely by locals. With foreign buying negligible, prices track local affordability and policy more than global capital — and the prime CCR segment foreigners once favoured has lagged the mass-market suburbs (up 1.7% versus 5.2%).
It means the market is now driven almost entirely by locals — Singaporeans and, to a lesser degree, PRs. Foreign demand, once a meaningful force in the prime segment, has been priced out at the margin, and that shows up where you would expect: the prime Core Central Region, the segment foreigners historically favoured, has lagged — up just 1.7% over the past year against the mass-market suburbs' 5.2%.
Two implications follow:
- Local income and policy set the pace. With foreign buying negligible, prices track local affordability, loan rules and cooling measures far more than global capital flows.
- The prime discount is partly a foreign-demand story. Some of the relative softness in CCR prices reflects the absence of the foreign buyers who used to compete there.
Insight line: Singapore's private market is, for now, a domestic market with a foreign-owned tail. For how the segments are actually moving, see the current state of the market.
The biggest misconception about foreign property buyers in Singapore
That foreigners are pricing locals out. Foreigners buy just 2.1% of new private homes and none of the HDB market — the market is overwhelmingly local. The 16.1% ownership figure is a legacy stock (including PRs), not current buying.
The biggest misconception is that foreigners are driving up prices and pricing locals out. The data says the opposite is now true: foreigners buy just 2.1% of new private homes, and none of the HDB market. Whatever is moving prices, it is overwhelmingly local demand.
Three corrections worth holding:
- Own vs buy are different. The often-quoted ownership share (16.1%, and that includes PRs) is a legacy stock, not current buying — which is a fraction of it.
- Private vs all housing. These figures cover private property only; across all homes, including HDB, the foreign share is far smaller.
- The wall is already up. A 60% stamp duty has already removed most foreign demand — the policy lever has been pulled hard.
Judge the foreign-buyer question by the flow, not the headline stock, and it looks very different from the debate.
Methodology and sources
Where every figure comes from — and what we deliberately did not claim.
Where the figures come from. Ownership and purchaser figures are URA's private residential owner-profile and purchaser-profile statistics, by nationality, read from PropKaki's database as of 2026Q1. Ownership counts assessed private residential units (including EC) by owner type; purchases count uncompleted (new-sale) private units bought in the quarter, excluding EC.
What we have not claimed: that foreigners alone own 16.1% (URA groups PRs and foreigners together in the ownership stock — the pure-foreigner share is smaller); that the purchaser count is large or stable (it is a small quarterly flow of new-sale units that swings); or that these cover HDB or the resale market (they do not — this is private property, and purchases are new-sale only). Regulatory figures — the 60% foreigner ABSD and the landed-approval rules — are as of 2026; verify the current position on IRAS and the Singapore Land Authority. This is general information, not financial or legal advice.
Got a question this raised? Ask PropKaki.
Take any point from this analysis and apply it to your own project, budget or decision.
For most buyers this year, staying well within budget beats trying to time the market.
